Categories
"vintage" porn stars Jack Wrangler

Heavy Equipment

Jack Wrangler (duh)

2 replies on “Heavy Equipment”

PART TWO:

This reply is a continuation of your meme showcasing “Heavy Equipment” on 11-25-22: “nice equipment”, indeed! : )

Jack seems especially hot and masculine, in the gym sequence confronting Roger: “I want to get my rocks off.” (!) FUCK YEAH! : )

I love the Greco-Roman wrestling move, which Roger applies to Jack; as he flips him over on his stomach, in order to fuck him on the massage table – hot! Fuck his ass! : D

Anyway, I found this publicity photo from “Heavy Equipment” on Retro Studs. Thank you Buck Naked! I’ve been meaning to share this with you and your readers. It wasn’t in the actual film. : )

I always thought this photo was originally from Man Shots Magazine. But seeing that your posted photo of Jack, was from SkinFlick Collection Magazine; I could be wrong – same issue?

I love when well-hung studs, fence their cocks against each other – “En garde!” : )

Jack and Roger, contrast beautifully – blond versus brunet!

Jack had a bigger dick, but Roger had a thicker bush! Neither of them was tall, but looking at their legs and butts, you can see that Jack had the slight edge in height! : )

No doubt, some will notice the wall poster of swimmer, Mark Spitz, on the right! Queers love minutia – LOL!

https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-z8TN0z3y-Zo/V_KkyJzJLiI/AAAAAAAAi2I/GKhQUqItMvYN47it2EWp0BNy7IxGOWzigCLcB/s1600/Jack%2Band%2BRoger-761389.jpg

I wish that director Tom DeSimone appreciated “Heavy Equipmnet” more. But he still made a fun movie! That’s what’s important! It was worth the arduous effort! : )

Once again, thanks BJ honey, for allowing me to elaborate! Really appreciate it! : )

To think, I didn’t need to spread myself, too thin – generous! : )

You’re so gracious, and redundant! Love it! LOL!

Ah, so many great and CONTINUING posts! So little time, but lots of space! : ( : )

; )

you’re funny – “meme” – not sure a post of mine with NO COMMENTS (until now) or now re-posts qualifies!

as far as photos and where they appear – they can easily appear in more than one publication, since usually, like here when it’s publicity shots for a film – it’s the film company providing shots, not the magazine hiring / buying from a photographer.

I’m OK with the director not caring for the film – he sees it much differently than we ever would, of course. He knows “what could have been” and we – or at least me, experience these films in a much different way than the guy who makes them! Many are background for other, perhaps more exciting events in the theatre itself!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.