or is that Craig and Kevin (1973) ? – parts 1 & 2
a Brentwood film – and once you watch this, you know the music was added later – starring Craig (Ron Fraser) and Kevin (apparently Ron did some modeling for In Touch) This version is from one of those Bucky’s Triple XXX collection of loops – and as annoying as the bad music, and mediocre quality is, it’s not always easy to find these films otherwise. But if I do, I’ll post.
update: Ron Fraser appeared in In Touch 9, 50, and Special Edition Vol1 No1
7 replies on “Kevin & Craig”
That music belongs at a circus !
The last music selection in that clip is “The Show Must Go On” from the 1960s UK-based musical duo Nirvana.
Excellent – thanks you – here’s an mp3 of The Show Must Go On – in fact, it might be the only piece of music that isn’t bad, and isn’t intrustive
Okay, BJ honey. Thank you so much, for this surprising loop. You’re always a wealth, of new information! Who knew? Ron Fraser is a hot Target guy. Is he really 6’3”? I admit to being titillated, that he appeared in gay porn. I always thought; he was just a nude model. I appreciate the added knowledge.
That being said, I think this porn loop is absolutely lousy! It epitomizes what I hate the most, in all-male porn! No passion, no affection, no sensuality, no personality, and no eroticism! ZZZzzz…
Nothing but robotic humping, of the mouth and ass – cold and clinical! The camera angles seldom change! Ron Fraser is a hot guy. They could have at least, emphasized his face and body.
I always feel for the “bottoms”, in these abusive types of loops – the top’s “bitch”. “Kevin” is reduced, to being a receptacle of sperm – humiliating!
Let’s move on to more interesting information, about Ron Fraser – please! I think you’ll appreciate this! Evidently, he appeared in “In Touch Magazine”, three times!
(Hope this link works!)
I got this from that pretentious, French website, “Homodesiribus”. Somehow, I just knew it would come in handy, for a future post of yours! And sure enough, it did! I tell you, we’re connected by psychic energy! This has happened too often, to just be a coincidence!
I find this to be the easiest method. You have to sign in. As I said before, put this link below, in your search engine. Keep it open, as you open another tab above, from the menu bar. Once again, put the URL in your search engine. Scroll down – samedi 30 mai 2015 (Saturday, May 30, 2015).
Voilà! You now have Ron Fraser’s 1975 photo layout in “In Touch Special Edition Volume One Number One” – six box icons of him personally!
https://homodesiribus.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2015-05-31T18:03:00%2B02:00&max-results=30
Want more? This link comes via the courtesy, of our illustrious, zephyr! We’re forever indebted to him – Thanks! In Touch Magazine #9 Volume 1 – June 1974: Pages 44 – 49 (Where’s page 46?).
https://archive.org/details/in-touch-for-men/InTouch/In-Touch/In%20Touch%20Vol1%20No09%201974-06/page/44/mode/2up
As I’ve said before, with gay porn, you win some, you lose some! : |
; )
Thanks Obsessed!
let’s give credit where credit is due – for me!! I already had the note on the In Touch magazines at the bottom of this post
but, of course, YOU got the Dutch/Craig/Ron thing “straightened out”!
perhaps someday I’ll add some good quality pics from those 3 In Touches (ooh, that first image from In Touch Special Edition Vol1 No1 is great!)
I think this is an awesome find! Well done. I don’t know how I missed this. I was here in 2022, wasn’t I? Oh well, I’ll figure that out later.
So sorry to disagree with Obsessed- to me, this isn’t lacking in passion. I mean, it depends on what you mean when you say passion. It’s clear these guys are fucking, not love-making. But I don’t know if it’s just perfunctory sex for the camera. You do get a lot of that in gay porn. IN the first five minutes you have a guy (Kevin, I guess) savoring the results of the blow job he just gave and if he isn’t experiencing something akin to passion, what is it? I know that face. I know that feeling. That’s “drunk on cum.”
Weird to have two cum shots right at the beginning, but they’re great cum shots, so I don’t mind. The 3rd one is very hot as well.
The music truly is atrocious, that can be agreed. I mean, are they meant to be at a carnival in Hawaii?! WTF. It’s hellish. And it distracts terribly, so I turned it down. The quality is poor, but it often is with these old loops. I’m just glad they’re still around to enjoy in any form. The camera is often too far away from the performers and at times you can’t see their faces. But I thought it was great and am so excited to see an old Target loop that I’ve never seen before.
No disrespect intended to Obsessed. Your viewpoint is valid. It’s just my opinion differs in this case.
I think the Part 2 is not the same two guys at all. It’s not Craig & Kevin. Craig has a mustache. Neither of these two do. It’s just another ’70s film loop from whatever Buckey’s Triple XXX collection this came from.
Admittedly, these two are less passionate than Craig & Kevin. It’s more leisurely. But not objectionable really. They’re both as hard as anybody that age often is and they are enthusiastic. They could be emoting a bit more. I would prefer that. Since you can’t hear they’re sounds, you don’t know if they’re quiet, but I think they were. I don’t always like quiet in gay porn. I like to hear sex sounds and some moaning or something. dirty talk can be fun if it’s done well. Of course, none of that applies with ’70s loops does it? Oh, the music is NOT good. The camera work could be better. If the first film had the camera too far away at times, this one has it too close a lot of the time. You gotta’ show their faces and you gotta’ pull out for full body shots. I’m no director, but that’s my take. Also, I like my guys a little more mature, and I like hairy and beefy, but it’s hard to deny the beauty of these young virile guys, bad 70s hair aside. The straight-haired guy won me over at the end when he smiles with those side burns and that gap-toothed grin. He looks familiar, but I couldn’t ID these two.
I thought this was fantastic for the most part. I get really excited about most stuff from the 1970s, I love the settings, I love the colors, I love the bad hair. Although that’s not to say that it’s all great. I’ve seen my share of terrible 70s porn. This was pretty great though, so thanks so much BJ for sharing! I can’t believe I missed this back in 2022.