Categories
photographers print porn models

performance

from a 1980 magazine titled Performance; models Tom York (blond) and Nik Milos; photography by Ned Hart

I started the post with just the top image – my favorite, but thought that’s not enough! Below, my 2nd favorite image from the magazine (such a furry crotch!!!); then a handful more for you to enjoy.






Categories
MAN'S IMAGE print porn models

HANK

Apparently, there’s more than one HANK on BJland – but feel free to click the link and check out all of them. These photos are from MEN of MAN’S IMAGE, which seems like a compilation, so I imagine HANK appears elsewhere, as well. I am fairly sure he is “just” a print model.





Categories
print porn models

The Painter

from a magazine with absolutely NO info – no publication date, no publisher, photographer nor model names. Hoped to scan and post more, but this will have to do – The Painter

OK, OK, can’t leave you hanging – let me add these, and what I think is the plot – painter arrives, starts to work, guy who hired him brings a glass of water, then, sex.



Categories
print porn models

mmmmmm… add a belt!

I’m scanning from a 1986 issue of Stallion magazine, and this gentleman, ahem, pops up. Oh Kristen Bjorn – really? Just lay a belt on his thick Greek thigh and…

ok, maybe it works. The gentleman’s name is Diogenes .


Categories
print porn models

Wolf Dehner

who you may remember from such films as:

  • (none that I can find)

So, Wolf Dehner – no films, one credited magazine with Al Parker; but, hope I’m not going out on another limb here – I am almost certain he is also in COLT’s Gallery #16 (1977), featuring Mike Davis, but uncredited. Did I get this one right?



who you may remember from such publications as:

  • Gallery #15 – pt2 (1977) w/Al Parker (COLT)
  • Gallery #16 (1977) w/Mike Davis (COLT)
  • The Al Parker Album (1982) w/Al Parker; pics from Gallery #15





Categories
print porn models

authentic consenting homosexual

Canadian Chuck – from a 1974 issue of Hombre magazine.

not usually looking at the fine print, I’m drawn more to.. fine balls! But, trying to get model/date/publication, etc. info I stumble upon the magazine’s motto – or should I say mottoes” as it has evolved – but 72-73?? Awesome!

1971: “This publication is produced to portray today’s social mores. Places and names are fictitious unless otherwise indicated”
1972: “This magazine is produced to portray today’s social scene. Males shown are not models, they are authentic consenting homosexuals.” which remained their motto through 1973

but, alas, in 1974: changed to: “This publication is produced to portray our contemporary mode of living.”

more Chuck – in a stream, naked handstand….



Categories
porno pet peeves print porn models

bĂȘte noire


This was originally a very simple post – the above pic, and that’s it.
Just enjoy it for a moment – beautifully composed, great body, the veins on the hand popping as it’s holding that upright gorgeous cock – Regarder!

Any regular reader would know I am a huge fan of Ben Chapin (AKA Michel Guillot), and while I may have seen the image before, I love it and think it’s enough to feast your eyes on and not need any text or additional pics. So, I had just scanned it from a newly acquired old magazine (Jockstrap – more on that in another post), cropped, uploaded, and continued scanning the magazine when I get to – oh, you’ll see. “Porno Pet Peeve” just isn’t enough. Anyway, I gasped – what art director thought this was a good idea??? Here, a bit more Ben before we get to the porno magazine art direction tragedy that this one simple page had me gagging in disbelief (the bad kind of gagging, no?).

So anyway, I get that no one created a dirty magazine thinking decades later some old sleazy rambling porno crazed guy would be uploading pics and complaining that each image isn’t perfect – the “inset” has it’s place, and I can see that sometimes it can add some interest, or just alternating the way each page is set up makes the magazine look better. Scroll all the way to the bottom of this post and you’ll see an image that, while I would prefer no inset at all, instead seeing the full beautiful image of that man without his shoulder cut off; but I get it. But if you dare, scroll just past this and see the horror, the horror of art direction gone amuck and someone who thinks it will look nice to obscure one of the most beautiful cocks ever to make it into a magazine.

Ben! (Michel!) please avert your eyes and don’t look at what’s been done!

If you’ve gotten this far, just know that there is a place to see the image as it was intended to be – on an earlier post I made of Ben Chapin!